Enhancement
Thought experiment: no associations, just topics
Issue description
Are associations really necessary? What if the roles would be not at association, but directly at the topic?
Developer comments
This could work, together with the drop of variants and just occurrences with some string occurrences being names, this would reduce the number of currently 6 constructs (topics, associations, occurrences, names, variants, roles) to 3: topics, occurrences (=properties or attributes) and roles. This would remove the need to "nominalize" associations into topic types and multiple association types.
|
|
We are sorry
This page cannot be displayed in your browser. Use Firefox, Opera, Safari, or Chrome instead.